Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorAkin, Laurie Allison
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T13:04:27Z
dc.date.available2017-05-19T13:04:27Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/33849
dc.descriptionLaurie Allison Akin is a member of the Class of 2017 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper was to state the case that we ought not to restrict sugar-sweetened beverages from SNAP because it would be ineffective, stigmatizing, paternalistic, and would violate human capabilities. Moving forward, I think what ought to be done to further decrease food insecurity and increase positive health outcomes would a movement toward more cash benefits. [From Conclusion]en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLaurie Akin
dc.format.extent29 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Capstone in Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleFood Freedom: Combatting Paternalism in SNAPen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.rights.holderAkin, Laurie Allison
dc.subject.fastSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.subject.fastPaternalism -- Moral and ethical aspectsen_US
dc.subject.fastEconomic assistance, Domesticen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record