Washington and Lee University Library
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Religion
    • View Item
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Religion
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Muslim Brotherhood and Defining the Community: An Evolution from the Universal to the Particular (thesis)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Honors thesis (16.95Mb)
    Author
    Wren, John Thomas
    Subject
    Washington and Lee University -- Honors in Religion
    Ummah (Islam)
    Globalization -- Religious aspects -- Islam
    Islam and culture
    Jamʻīyat al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn (Egypt)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    Thesis; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]
     
    John Thomas Wren, Jr. is a member of the Class of 2010 of Washington and Lee University.
     
    The definition of the umma/(community) has evolved considerably over the existence of the Muslim Brotherhood. The evolution of this concept can be traced by following the ideological leadership of this organization from the founder Hasan alBanna, to his successor Sayyid Qutb, and finally to the modern leadership under Muhammad Akef and Mohammed Habib. The works of Benedict Anderson and Olivier Roy regarding nationalism and globalization respectively are particularly useful as paradigmatic viewpoints in analyzing the factors which have contributed to the evolution of the umma in the Brotherhood. Ultimately, the organization's definition of the umma shifted away from the universalistic doctrine of the founder to a localized extent in the modern period. This was attributable to the rising power of Egyptian nationalism and also the growing globalization, deterritorialization, and secularism that was sweeping Egypt in the 20th and into the 21st century. This analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood's evolving definition of the umma is significant because it suggests that many modern religious communities are not following the trend of universalization that Roy claims is occurring in the modern period. Rather, these communities are engaging in the more complex process by which universalizing and nationalizing is occurring concomitantly within the confines of a localized re-imagining of their communities.
     
    Jack Wren
     
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11021/16286
    Collections
    • W&L Dept. of Religion

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of the Digital ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV