Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorHuang, Yuji E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-03T13:54:53Z
dc.date.available2013-12-03T13:54:53Z
dc.date.created2009
dc.identifierWLURG38_Huang_POV_2009_wm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/24185
dc.descriptionYuji E. Huang is a member of the Class of 2009 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.description.abstractTechnological inventions such as the Internet, satellites, mobile technology, and wireless access to information have infiltrated nearly every aspect of human life: personal communication has become distant and instant, businesses have used the speed and interconnectivity of new technology to great advance, and "Google” has become a verb. While modern technology has undoubtedly revolutionized life in the developed world, the impact of modern technology on the developing world is perhaps more complex. On one hand, governments in developing nations, private non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and groups such as the United Nations or the World Bank have heralded the so-called "information and communications technologies for development (ICT4D)” movement; these proponents see in this approach the potential for a poverty panacea. Critics of the information and communications technologies (ICT) efforts, however, speculate that such a plan would only further exacerbate impoverished conditions in the developing world by causing these nations to be increasingly marginalized. Such critics believe that the continued use of ICTs to encourage development can actually have the reverse effect of increasing the "digital divide” between the rich and the poor, the urban and the rural, the developed and the significantly less so. This paper addresses several questions regarding the use of ICTs and the ICT4D movement at large. First, how did the movement come to originate, and who are the major players? Second, what are the theoretical arguments for the ICT4D movement, and how does the theory translate into practice? Third, what are the arguments against the movement, and what evidence of failure in prior case studies exists to support these arguments? Finally, what, if any, benefits can reasonably be expected from continuing the ICT4D movement, and how can individuals and institutions best ensure the most beneficial, or the least harmful, application of ICT4D strategies?en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityYuji Eugina Huang
dc.format.extent23 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Capstone in Shepherd Program for the Interdisciplinary Study of Poverty and Human Capabilityen_US
dc.titleThe Future's Fix: Using Information and Communications Technology to Reduce Global Povertyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderHuang, Yuji E.
dc.subject.fastCapabilities approach (Social sciences)en_US
dc.subject.fastPovertyen_US
dc.subject.fastMillennium Development Goalsen_US
dc.subject.fastGlobalizationen_US
dc.subject.fastDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subject.fastCommunication -- Technological innovations -- Social aspectsen_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record