Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorRoberts, Jacob Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-22T12:55:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-22T12:55:38Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.identifierWLURG38_Roberts_POV_2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/33869
dc.descriptionJacob Stuart Roberts is a member of the Class of 2017 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.description.abstractHospital readmissions present a significant financial burden to Medicare payment systems and indicate poor health outcomes for patients following hospitalization. The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) has been implemented as a measure to reduce readmissions and improve the quality of care provided by hospitals. In order to incentivize changes in care processes, the HRRP employs the use of financial penalties to reduce Medicare payments to hospitals with excessive readmissions. While the implementation of this penalty program has led to macro-level improvements in readmission rates across the country, hospitals serving the most socioeconomically disadvantaged patient groups have been the most heavily penalized under the HRRP. Though some argue that these hospitals have higher readmission rates because they provide a lower standard of care, the increased incidence of readmissions at these hospitals is largely explained by the socioeconomic conditions of their patient populations. As a result, the penalty program detracts financial resources from hospitals that care for patients with the most complex health needs, and this penalty distribution may in turn unjustly increase health disparities by restricting the health care services that are available to poorer patient populations. Therefore, the current HRRP penalty system requires adjustments to ensure that the financial penalties made under the program are not allocated according to an inequitable distribution of the social and economic determinants of health. In order to sustain long-term improvements in readmission rates, health care reform should aim at increasing measures that emphasize comprehensive care processes to directly target the causes of readmissions for individual patients.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJacob Roberts
dc.format.extent44 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleReducing Hospital Readmissions for Vulnerable Patient Populations: Policy Concerns and Interventionsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderRoberts, Jacob Stuart
dc.subject.fastMedicare -- Cost controlen_US
dc.subject.fastHospitals -- Prospective paymenten_US
dc.subject.fastHospitals -- Admission and dischargeen_US
dc.subject.fastHealth care reform -- Moral and ethical aspectsen_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record