Washington and Lee University Library
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Religion
    • REL Honors Theses
    • View Item
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Religion
    • REL Honors Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reclaiming Responsibility: Theological Resources for Criminal Justice Reform (thesis)

    View/Open
    Honors thesis (251.9Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Grist, Thomas M.
    Subject
    Washington and Lee University -- Honors in Religion
    Imprisonment
    Stigmatization
    Niebuhr, Reinhold, 1892-1971
    Bonhoeffer, Dietrich, 1906-1945
    King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    Thesis; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]
     
    Thomas M. Grist is a member of the Class of 2018 of Washington and Lee University.
     
    The United States incarcerates more individuals than any other country in the world. The anthropological viewpoint that allows these injustices to persist sees incarcerated individuals as existentially different than individuals who are not incarcerated. This paper contends that the theological anthropologies of Reinhold Niebuhr, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Martin Luther King, Jr. will expose the injustices of excessive imprisonment, stigmatization, and disenfranchisement of persons who live under the modern system of mass incarceration. Specifically, I will show that Niebuhr’s understanding of the inevitability of sin opposes the modern belief that criminals have a different existential standing from other humans. Niebuhr’s belief in social sin will also call into question the justice of our current penal system. Bonhoeffer’s Christological framework, through which he understands Christ to be “the man for others,” will underscore responsibility for others. King’s belief in forgiveness and reconciliation provides a corrective for the excessive sentencing and, in many states, disenfranchisement of individuals with a felony record. Though this paper will not offer concrete policy solutions, it will conclude by emphasizing the responsibility that all people have for advocacy on behalf of those under carceral control.
     
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11021/34097
    Collections
    • REL Honors Theses
    • W&L Dept. of Religion

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of the Digital ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV