Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorBaya, William C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T12:57:42Z
dc.date.available2022-04-21T12:57:42Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.identifierWLURG38_Baya_POV_2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/35830
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.descriptionWilliam C. Baya is a member of the Class of 2022 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores three key themes in addressing the housing and homelessness paradigm: resource distribution, deservingness, and quality of housing. Firstly, on resource distribution, should housing programs maximally serve a small portion of the homeless population or serve everyone ever so slightly? This question stems from the fact that housing organizations ought to enable people to live decent lives. However, due to a myriad of constraints, organizations can't lift each person out of homelessness. Secondly, on deservingness, are eligibility criteria set forth by housing programs justified? Requirements demanded by housing organizations tend to neglect the very people who need housing assistance the most. Lastly, on the quality of housing, what should housing programs enable people to do and be? This question investigates the underlying shortcomings of housing programs that prevent clients from ever getting a home. This paper is divided into six sections. The first section touches on some of the existing factors that lead to homelessness followed by an analysis of two housing models -- Housing First and Treatment First Continuum of Care -- to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The second section focuses on how housing can be thought of as capability deprivation seeing as it obstructs the attainment of Nussbaum's ten essential qualities for a life to be considered well-lived. The third section explores a conceptual model of homelessness that should inform the elements of homelessness and home that housing programs should address to enable a minimally just society in which people are not just housed, but also living a life worth living. The fourth section discusses two moral justice theories -- utilitarianism and contractualism -- to set grounds for how housing programs should be evaluated. The fifth section does a comparison of three existing housing/shelter models. The sixth and last section offers policy recommendations on how empowering marketable workforce skills in housing clients, or the homeless population, can enable individuals to be self-sufficient and put them on a path out of homelessness. [From introductory section]en_US
dc.format.extent33 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleInadequate Workforce Skillset as a Corrosive Disadvantage: Enhancing Marketable Skills to Combat Housing and Homelessness Issuesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderBaya, William C.
dc.subject.fastHomelessnessen_US
dc.subject.fastVocational qualifications -- Standardsen_US
dc.subject.fastCapabilities approach (Social sciences)en_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record