dc.rights.license | In Copyright | en_US |
dc.creator | Baya, William C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-21T12:57:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-21T12:57:42Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022 | |
dc.identifier | WLURG38_Baya_POV_2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11021/35830 | |
dc.description | Capstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE] | en_US |
dc.description | William C. Baya is a member of the Class of 2022 of Washington and Lee University. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores three key themes in addressing the housing and homelessness
paradigm: resource distribution, deservingness, and quality of housing. Firstly, on resource
distribution, should housing programs maximally serve a small portion of the homeless
population or serve everyone ever so slightly? This question stems from the fact that housing
organizations ought to enable people to live decent lives. However, due to a myriad of
constraints, organizations can't lift each person out of homelessness. Secondly, on
deservingness, are eligibility criteria set forth by housing programs justified? Requirements
demanded by housing organizations tend to neglect the very people who need housing assistance
the most. Lastly, on the quality of housing, what should housing programs enable people to do and be? This question investigates the underlying shortcomings of housing programs that prevent
clients from ever getting a home.
This paper is divided into six sections. The first section touches on some of the existing
factors that lead to homelessness followed by an analysis of two housing models -- Housing First
and Treatment First Continuum of Care -- to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The second
section focuses on how housing can be thought of as capability deprivation seeing as it obstructs
the attainment of Nussbaum's ten essential qualities for a life to be considered well-lived. The
third section explores a conceptual model of homelessness that should inform the elements of
homelessness and home that housing programs should address to enable a minimally just society
in which people are not just housed, but also living a life worth living. The fourth section
discusses two moral justice theories -- utilitarianism and contractualism -- to set grounds for how housing programs should be evaluated. The fifth section does a comparison of three existing housing/shelter models. The sixth and last section offers policy recommendations on how
empowering marketable workforce skills in housing clients, or the homeless population, can
enable individuals to be self-sufficient and put them on a path out of homelessness. [From introductory section] | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 33 pages | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | This material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Washington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Program | en_US |
dc.title | Inadequate Workforce Skillset as a Corrosive Disadvantage: Enhancing Marketable Skills to Combat Housing and Homelessness Issues | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | RG38 - Student Papers | |
dc.rights.holder | Baya, William C. | |
dc.subject.fast | Homelessness | en_US |
dc.subject.fast | Vocational qualifications -- Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.fast | Capabilities approach (Social sciences) | en_US |
local.department | Shepherd Poverty Program | en_US |
local.scholarshiptype | Capstone | en_US |