Washington and Lee University Library
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Economics
    • View Item
    •   Digital Archive Home
    • W&L University Student Scholarship
    • W&L Dept. of Economics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Survival Analysis on the Waiting Lists for Kidney Transplants in the United States: Who Waits the Most? (thesis)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Honors thesis, PDF (1.652Mb)
    Author
    Johnson, Samantha
    Subject
    Washington and Lee University -- Honors in Economics
    Kidneys -- Transplantation -- Economic aspects
    Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc. -- Law and legislation
    UNOS (Organization)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    Thesis; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]
     
    Samantha Johnson is a member of the Class of 2022 of Washington and Lee University.
     
    The National Organ Transplantation Act, passed in 1984, continues to be utilized in an effort to address the disparity between the quantity supplied and demanded of kidneys. The National Organ Transplantation Act declared organs to be a "scarce public resource," and that such a resource should be distributed "by criteria based on need, effectiveness, and fairness that are publicly stated and publicly defended" (Gupta 2008). However, who dictates and enforces such criteria is not well defined nor regulated. Subsequently, as the average length of time one must wait to receive an organ increases, many wonder what characteristics, if any, makes an individual more inclined to be moved off the waitlist and to receive a kidney donation. Although the United States' altruistic-driven kidney market is hypothetically structured in such a way that organs are "distributed fairly using a transparent system," certain biases may persist as they would in any other setting (National Kidney Foundation 2021). The following theoretical analysis will examine why certain characteristics are expected to influence the aforementioned 'transparent' matching process such that the system disproportionately benefits certain demographics. The theoretical analysis will be twofold. The first segment of the analysis will observe an individuals' likelihood of being placed on the transplant list. The second will then consider an individual's likelihood of receiving a transplant conditional they are on the waiting list. [From Introduction]
     
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11021/35855
    Collections
    • W&L Dept. of Economics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of the Digital ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV