Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorJohansen, Lane Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T15:35:35Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T15:35:35Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.identifierWLURG38_Johansen_RAS_2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.wlu.edu/handle/11021/36046
dc.descriptionThesis; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.descriptionLane Elizabeth Johnansen is a member of the Class of 2022 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhen Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Ukraine became more unified than ever before, decisively linking its identity to freedom and democracy. Careful analysis of how Ukraine has responded in the face of existential threats throughout its history -- increasingly unifying and considering itself a modern European state -- reveals why Putin's decision to launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine with the assumption of a swift victory was one of the greatest strategic blunders in Russian history. Using an analysis and comparison of the literature, public opinion survey data, and presidential and parliamentary electoral results before and after the watershed year of 2014, I find that Ukraine's three revolutions since 1990 -- as well as response to the current war with Russia -- can be considered successive stages of nation-building. Throughout this process, Ukrainian national identity has evolved from a negative definition (i.e., "we are not Russia") to a positive definition (i.e., "we are a modern, democratic Ukraine") intrinsically tied to Euro-Atlantic integration. This civic national identity has diffused across the country and -- catalyzed by intensifying Russian aggression -- largely avoided polarization and instead effectively unified Ukrainians, drawing legitimacy from its hybrid character. With an end to macro-regional polarization in Ukraine after 2014, this civic Ukrainian national identity can be considered to have become hegemonic in the country, a development that helps explain the erroneousness of conflating Russian ethnolinguistic background with a pro-Russian political orientation.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLane Johansen
dc.format.extent97 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Honors in Russian Area Studiesen_US
dc.titleThe Evolution of Ukrainian National Identity (thesis)en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderJohansen, Lane Elizabeth
dc.subject.fastUkraineen_US
dc.subject.fastNationalismen_US
dc.subject.fastInternational relationsen_US
local.departmentRussian Area Studiesen_US
local.scholarshiptypeHonors Thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record