Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorGetachew, Beamelak
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-18T12:46:56Z
dc.date.available2023-05-18T12:46:56Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.identifierWLURG38_Getachew_ECON_2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.wlu.edu/handle/11021/36214
dc.descriptionThesis; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.descriptionBeamelak Getachew is a member of the Class of 2023 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.description.abstractNearly all regions of the world have observed repeated cycles of violence involving anti-state militias and domestic or international terrorist groups since the end of World War II. A 2020 UN Human Rights Office report on conflict-related civilian casualties revealed that 5 out of 100,000 civilians are killed every year due to conflict (UN| SDG Indicator 16.1.2, 2020). War is costly, and sustainable war resolution efforts are complicated by the socio-political and economic contexts on which wars' characteristics are contingent. By granularly examining wars in their respective contexts, however, peace-building literature has uncovered rebel group fragmentation, the process by which rebel organizations splinter into distinct armed entities, as an increasingly common characteristic of armed conflict. . . . A similar history of complex, and often overlapping, changes in rebel group composition has sophisticated many government-rebel wars. Rebel infighting, typically provoked by socio-political or economic divergences, often increases the number of incompatibilities necessitating government attention. In the case of Myanmar, fragmentation not only increased the number of rebel groups fought by the government at a given time, but additionally diversified reasons of contention from, for instance, the seeking of an autonomous state to the seeking of a socialist autonomous one. These effects of fragmentation are certainly evident in Mali's conflict history, too. . . . These cases of Myanmar and Mali demonstrate both the commonality of fragmentation and its influence on conflict outcome. The aim of this paper is to examine its effect specifically on war recurrence. Peace building literature has identified an increase in "conflict trap," the tendency for countries to become trapped in repeated cycles of violence (Collier & Sambanis, 2002). A current challenge in peace-building, therefore, is not only punctually and effectively preventing new-war onset but intercepting the relapse of old ones. This paper, to that end, will examine the effect of rebel group fragmentation on war recurrence. [From Introduction]en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBami Getachew
dc.format.extent31 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Honors in Economicsen_US
dc.titleCombatant Composition and Peace Durability: A Historical and Empirical Dive into Rebel Group Fragmentation as a Determinant of Conflict Relapseen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderGetachew, Beamelak
dc.subject.fastBurmaen_US
dc.subject.fastMalien_US
dc.subject.fastConflict managementen_US
dc.subject.fastTerrorism -- Preventionen_US
local.departmentEconomicsen_US
local.scholarshiptypeHonors Thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record