Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorDillon, Jeanne Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T17:40:08Z
dc.date.available2023-10-20T17:40:08Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.identifierWLURG038_Dillon_thesis_1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.wlu.edu/handle/11021/36336
dc.description.abstractWhatever the reason, lesbianism was often seen as vampiric, monstrous, and even predatory. Bishop alludes to some of these socially deviant qualities in her work, creating characters that often possess traces of such features, especially in relation to the night. Many of her subjects and speakers are night creatures, suggesting the secrecy, inverted living habits, and even monstrousness which has been strongly associated with lesbianism. This paper aims to examine several such texts in order to discover how and to what extent Bishop encodes homosexuality into her poetry. In fact, Bishop struggles to resolve social definitions of homosexuality as narcissistic and disorderly. The myth of Narcissus, or at least his mirror, surfaces throughout her work and threatens her subjects with homosexual self-recognition which (in the tradition ofNarcissus) leads to self-destruction. Dangerous mirrors, narcissism, inversion and deviant subjects are all parts of Bishop's subversive homosexuality. These images are also indicative of Bishop's tension between her own lesbianism and her disapproving culture. She is haunted by Freud's interpretation of homosexuality as narcissistic, as well as society's definition of the lesbian as a creature of darkness -- a monster and an "invert." . . . It was not until 1973 that "the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders" (Faderman 132). Bishop lived and wrote with an everpresent understanding that her sexuality, like that of all inverts in the early and middle part of the century, was a threat to her identity. Unless closeted, and for all intents and purposes she was, her mental and emotional health would be publicly challenged. This is not to say that Bishop's work reflects sexual shame or self-loathing: she feels restricted by cultural definitions of sexuality and it is apparent in her work. I do not suggest that Bishop believes that she is narcissistic or mentally sick. I do suggest, however, that Freudian theories and public opinion about lesbianism certainly influences the way she writes about sexuality and self-discovery. [From Introduction]en_US
dc.format.extent88 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleInversion and the Poetry of Elizabeth Bishopen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfWLURG038 - Student Papersen_US
dc.rights.holderDillon, Jeanne Margareten_US
dc.subject.fastBishop, Elizabeth, 1911-1979 -- Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.fastAmerican poetry -- Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.fastLesbianism in literatureen_US
dc.subject.fastLesbianism -- Psychological aspectsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record